欢迎来到得力文库 - 分享文档赚钱的网站! | 帮助中心 好文档才是您的得力助手!
得力文库 - 分享文档赚钱的网站
全部分类
  • 研究报告>
  • 管理文献>
  • 标准材料>
  • 技术资料>
  • 教育专区>
  • 应用文书>
  • 生活休闲>
  • 考试试题>
  • pptx模板>
  • 工商注册>
  • 期刊短文>
  • 图片设计>
  • ImageVerifierCode 换一换

    Action-research-in-action-Paper-3-as-an-example.ppt

    • 资源ID:32687110       资源大小:129.50KB        全文页数:22页
    • 资源格式: PPT        下载积分:20金币
    快捷下载 游客一键下载
    会员登录下载
    微信登录下载
    三方登录下载: 微信开放平台登录   QQ登录  
    二维码
    微信扫一扫登录
    下载资源需要20金币
    邮箱/手机:
    温馨提示:
    快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。
    如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
    支付方式: 支付宝    微信支付   
    验证码:   换一换

     
    账号:
    密码:
    验证码:   换一换
      忘记密码?
        
    友情提示
    2、PDF文件下载后,可能会被浏览器默认打开,此种情况可以点击浏览器菜单,保存网页到桌面,就可以正常下载了。
    3、本站不支持迅雷下载,请使用电脑自带的IE浏览器,或者360浏览器、谷歌浏览器下载即可。
    4、本站资源下载后的文档和图纸-无水印,预览文档经过压缩,下载后原文更清晰。
    5、试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。

    Action-research-in-action-Paper-3-as-an-example.ppt

    Koutselini, M. (2008). Participatory teacher development at schools: Processes and issues. Action Research, 6(1), 29-48.In this whole class session Part 1: Your interpretation of paper 3 Part 2: Looking for action research features in paper 3 Part 3: Writing up action researchPart 1Your interpretation of paper 3 What are the questions?What are the questions? Why is the study necessary?Why is the study necessary? How is the study described in this paper?How is the study described in this paper? (Purpose, participants, procedures, Purpose, participants, procedures, dada analysis?dada analysis?) What are the conceptual changes in the What are the conceptual changes in the teachers?teachers?Research questions What reflective processes will promote teacher self-evaluation, understanding and development? How do teachers implicitly understand school-based curriculum development? How do teachers conceptualise their role as curriculum developers? How can teachers understand and value the processes of reflective development?Part 2Looking for action research features in paper 3Action research in simple termsThe action research cyclePaper 3: the aim of the studyWhat conception changes? From traditional instrumental, positivist paradigm of teacher development where expertise about what to teach and how to teach comes from external sources and is imposed upon teachers thru teacher training To the reflective paradigm of teacher development or teacher empowerment, where teachers work together and think for themselves Participants 16 teachers, one inspector, 2 principals Researchers (author + 3 graduate students)Reflection was done through Weekly meetings. 3 rounds of meetings presented. During these meetings, participants discussed Problems Ideas Actions Reflections New action Diary of events and thoughts after each meetingThree cycles of meetings as a way to bring about desired changes Cycle 1 (3 meetings): focusing on collaborative problem identification Problem: Ts lack of trust for each other Solution: small grp discussion and ethos building Cycle 2 (4 meetings): focusing on collaborative decision making and planning for action Problem: Ts prefer to be told what to do Cycle 3 (4 meetings): focusing on planning further actionAction research features Participant involvement Who were the researchers? Who were the agents of action?Whose purposes? whose actions? Whose reflections? For whose improvement?Problem identificationWhat was the research problem(s)? Who had these problems and needed solution?Dynamic, cyclical processWhat exactly was done? Step by step procedures?Targeted changesWhat were the desired changes as a result of critical action and reflection?What monitoring/evaluative procedures were involved?To what extent was the problem resolved?Next round of actions and reflectionsWhat further actions were proposed? Is this a typical action research project? Why or why not?Two action research projects in onePurpose of Action research projectResearcher participantsTo empower teachers by bringing about changes in conceptions of teaching and learningOther participants (teachers, principals, and inspector)To reflect on their own teaching practices and improve their teachingThe “participant” outsider: a nagging issue with AR“However much the rhetoric changes to participation, participatory research, community involvement and the like, at the end of the day there is still an outsider seeking to change things. who the outsider is may change but the relation is the same. A stronger person wants to change things for a person who is weaker. From this paternal trap there is no complete escape.”Chambers 1983Part 3Writing up action researchWriting up action research: The role of theories Why theory? What theoretical framework was used in this report?Emancipation vs instrumental knowledgeContextualised, situated learningAR in teacher developmentWriting up action research: Paper 3 What was the overall message the author was trying to convey? Has the message been clearly and convincingly presented? Why or why not?Paper 3 as a research report How was this report organised? Do you like this organisation? How would you write it if you were asked to improve the report?Clarity! Clarity! Clarity! AR 易做不易写 My advice for your AR reportClarity in purposeClarity in argumentation structure Clarity in language of presentation

    注意事项

    本文(Action-research-in-action-Paper-3-as-an-example.ppt)为本站会员(豆****)主动上传,得力文库 - 分享文档赚钱的网站仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知得力文库 - 分享文档赚钱的网站(点击联系客服),我们立即给予删除!

    温馨提示:如果因为网速或其他原因下载失败请重新下载,重复下载不扣分。




    关于得利文库 - 版权申诉 - 用户使用规则 - 积分规则 - 联系我们

    本站为文档C TO C交易模式,本站只提供存储空间、用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,本站只是中间服务平台,本站所有文档下载所得的收益归上传人(含作者)所有。本站仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。若文档所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知得利文库网,我们立即给予删除!客服QQ:136780468 微信:18945177775 电话:18904686070

    工信部备案号:黑ICP备15003705号-8 |  经营许可证:黑B2-20190332号 |   黑公网安备:91230400333293403D

    © 2020-2023 www.deliwenku.com 得利文库. All Rights Reserved 黑龙江转换宝科技有限公司 

    黑龙江省互联网违法和不良信息举报
    举报电话:0468-3380021 邮箱:hgswwxb@163.com  

    收起
    展开