2020GRE作文开头段写法要点.doc
《2020GRE作文开头段写法要点.doc》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《2020GRE作文开头段写法要点.doc(15页珍藏版)》请在得力文库 - 分享文档赚钱的网站上搜索。
1、2020GRE作文开头段写法要点一篇优秀的GRE高分作文从头开始就能给考官留下好印象。而一直以来作文开头段的重要性也向来备受强调。今天小编给大家带来了GRE作文开头段写法要点 ,希望能够帮助到大家,一起来。GRE作文开头段写法要点开门见山是开头段写法核心思路开头段的长度是考生首先要考虑好的一点。对于一篇GRE文章来说,开头段应注意开门见山简单扼要,通过短短几句话把观点表达清楚即可,一般建议以三句话为标准。过长的开头段会给人头重脚轻的感觉,从而导致文章整体失衡,是GRE写作的大忌。有些考生过度强调开头段的写作,搜肠刮肚地把好词妙句堆砌到开头部分,其实这么做反而是大忌,很容易引起考官的反感导致意外
2、扣分。高分开头段从引用原文入手这是很多考生都容易忽略的一点。开头段的第一句话,要先引用作文题目的内容,通过引用自然过渡到论述当中。没头没脑的直接开始论述,会让人产生突兀的感觉,对于一篇以论述为主的文章来说是十分不利的。有些同学甚至老师生怕文章字数不够,在开头的引用部分对原文题目进行大量的PARAPHRASE改写,想要多凑字数,这种投机取巧的方法一眼就会被考官发现,反而会让开头变得累赘,模糊掉考生自己的观点,也是经常造成扣分的原因之一。ISSUE和ARGUMENT开头段写法有区别GRE作文ISSUE的开头段不必多说,直接阐明观点就好。而驳论文ARGUMENT的开头段,考生则需要做好两件事。一是简
3、要说明论述的观点,二是指出观点的漏洞。只要做到这两点,开头段的作用就达到了。需要注意的是,在简要说明观点时,不要原句照抄题目中的观点,适当变换一下表达方法是必要措施。另外,不要在开头段中具体展开观点的漏洞,简单点出问题在哪里即可。把详细展开部分留到正文当中。GRE作文AW优秀开头段分享因为开头段需要简洁,因此适当套用一些常用句式模式是不错的做法。考生可以提前做一些模板的准备,尽量使用自己的语言来进行讲述和整理,在写开头段时直接套用即可。下面是一些常用的开头段句式:“This plan is likely to fail due to flaws in the reasoning and log
4、ic of the editorial.”“This remedy is unlikely to be successful due to flaws in reasoning.”“This argument contains some egregious flaws in reasoning making the conclusion doubtful.”“The success of this recommendation is doubtful considering the logical flaws and faulty assumptions on which it is base
5、d.”总而言之,开头段的好坏关于整篇文章给考官留下的第一印象,就好比面试时着装是否得体一样,这种印象将在很大程度上影响考官之后的判断和打分,因此小编希望大家重视GRE作文开头段的写作,争取写出能够第一时间征服考官的优秀开头段。GRE写作高分范文:新创意GRE写作题目:Truly innovative ideas do not arise from groups of people, but from individuals.When groups try to be creative, the members force each other to compromise and, as a r
6、esult, creative ideas tend to be weakened and made more conventional. Most original ideas arise from individuals working alone.真正有创意的想法并非来自于群体而是来自于个人。当群体试图创新的时候,它的成员之间会被迫相互妥协,结果就是新想法趋于弱化而更接近于传统。大部分新想法都是来自于独立工作的个人。GRE写作正文:I agree with the speaker on that truly innovative ideas arise from individuals.
7、Nevertheless, it is unfair to claim unilaterally that the groups tend to weaken creative ideas without thinking of their positive effects on the ideas; it is equally important for groups to examine, modify, or even reject the ideas.First of all, truly innovative ideas are destined to arise from indi
8、viduals in that inter-personal thinking process is so far impossible. This is to say, when we sit still and have a cluster of phenomena, theories, statistics and so forth of a certain issue in our mind, we are thinking it over yet with no assistance at all. After all it is impossible for one to intr
9、ude into other s mind. Following this principle, innovative ideas spark off during the process of meditation, and they are the produced by one s own effort. It is equally possible, however, for people to be inspired by each other, yet this is by no means assistance in thinking. Clues, hints, inspira
10、tions are to remind people of things ignored or taken for granted, but have nothing to do with the process of thinking, that is, to sort out the whole vision and draw conclusion. In one word, innovative ideas arise from meditation, which is solely limited within one body, one brain. Therefore innova
11、tive ideas are always the product of individual s work.Nevertheless, it does not suggest that innovative ideas then have nothing to do with group work, and actually it is just the opposite. When a novel thought is brought up, it is of great importance to fully evaluate its validity, feasibility, and
12、 consequences if carried out. This point need no further illustration if we think of a father who resolutely stops his 6-year-old son from playing matches. The kid might have intended to try something new, driven by an innovative idea, yet the whole house might have caught fire also since the boy is
13、 incapable of dealing with accidents. This is the same case in academic fields. In a chemistry lab for example, a novel route design of synthesizing a new compound is never carried out without further evaluation. Practical conditions such as equipments, reagents, and economic efficiency, namely yiel
14、d per cost, are always taken into consideration and sometimes restrict the application of those ideas.This is to say, innovation is usually good but not always practicable. This claim is fully demonstrated in the political field. Governors of all levels must take holistic views of the situation and
15、make balanced decision in order to avoid mistakes; innovative ideas alone cannot justify their practicability and goodwill to others. For instance, when we look back, the development of plastic industry has resulted in great loss in the global ecosystem. Thus we see the disastrous consequences of ca
16、rrying out such innovative yet premature ideas.Hence, it is necessary for the groups to assess, remedy, and conclude the value and use of innovative ideas. All innovative ideas should be brought to discussions. With the clash of skeptical attitude of others to the advocating behavior of the thinker,
17、 fallacies made in a haste can be easily found and eliminated, which rectifies, sometimes supplements the idea. I don t agree with the speaker on his/her judgment of group work as compromising, weakening and conventionalizing innovation. Group work promotes those justified and useful innovative idea
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 2020 GRE 作文 开头 写法 要点
限制150内